May you interrupt for Previous Question?

In parliamentary procedure, the concept of "Previous Question" refers to a motion that is used to end debate on a current question and bring it to an immediate vote. It is a formal request made by a member during a meeting, and once it is stated, it requires a subsequent vote to decide whether to end the debate.

Interrupting for a motion like Previous Question is not permissible because it typically requires that the current speaker has finished their statement. Parliamentary rules are structured to maintain order and allow individuals to complete their thoughts. By not allowing interruptions for such motions, the process encourages respect for the floor and ensures that discussions are orderly.

The prohibition on interruptions helps to streamline meetings and avoid chaos. Members must wait until it is appropriate to raise such motions—generally following established speaking protocols in the debate.

As such, the answer, which states that one may not interrupt for the Previous Question, aligns with the formal rules governing parliamentary procedure, fostering a respectful and organized meeting environment.